Jagex has come under fire this season because of RuneScape gold its microtransaction practices in RuneScape, even to the point of being known to them by the government. We reported on a meeting that laid out a few details regarding not only the developer's content plans for 2020 but a bit about its monetization practices going forward. Also last week, several of the developers talked on a livestream that has since been uploaded to YouTube and embedded under. If you do not need to watch the entire talk, there is a useful summary on Reddit. The core issue is that the"Duty of Care" which Jagex is trying to highlight and make a reality for its runescape playerssplit into three chief components: freedom of choice, a protected environment, and also satisfying engagement.
Freedom of choice revolves round the runescape player's ability to make healthy choices concerning money and play time. Jagex intends to reach out to runescape players who have spent an inordinate sum of money. This will be implemented at a"trial of an automated system before Christmas." A safe environment encapsulates many of the community aspects of gaming which we are all aware of -- toxicity, harassment etc -- and combatting gold-sellers along with runescape player-run games of chance.
Ultimately, satisfying engagement means making certain rewards are in line with expectations, which includes the"goal to take RNG almost entirely away" from loot boxes. Treasure Hunt probabilities will probably be"visibly open," with all rewards being by choice. Jagex said that it needs to be more"clear in regards to the mechanics of specific promotions." It must be noted that the recent announcements by the authorities are only a recommendation, but not a legal requirement. However, even this amount of public scrutiny seems to be having an influence and forcing Jagex to buy OSRS gold rethink how it does business. We will take what we can get, although It'd be fine if the company had done this completely on its own, rather than to prevent publicity.On the point that was raised earlier on, where we've aligned ourselves to psychological health, that came from internally our staff and us experiencing from our staff raised difficulties around mental health. We upped our game from our programmes and our HR division and so forth. Through that, I would say, we are not ignoring any of these things.